Big Rowan Ackison (greensh) wrote,
Big Rowan Ackison
greensh

Sex - The Intimacy and Contracts of Relationships

"Sex" means many things to many people. A fuller picture unfolds if you translate sex to mean intimacy. Intimacy can range from a quick look at an attractive someone in the street ("put your eyes back in your head!") to only full penetration being intimacy ("oral sex is not Sex!"). Add to this the varying beliefs on the sacredness of the intimate act. Consider the word "contract" if sacredness does not sound right. The boyfriend/girlfriend contract tends to have the most sexual contracts, with only the marital contract having more (one would hope!). The sexual contracts vary in intent. Some are emotional (I can’t share you with anybody else) and some are hygienic (don’t bring anything home to me!).

The gorilla in the middle of many relationship rooms is monogamy (or lack of). People’s attitudes on monogamy differ based on their definitions of intimacy and their buy-in to the relationship’s contract. In a harmonious relationship the partners agree on definitions of intimacy and contracts. People really vary here. There are swingers (who’s on the menu tonight?) who are happy with other swingers and puritans (sex only for procreation!) who are happy with puritans. The disharmony shows up when you mix the swingers with the puritans.

The concept of Love has a strange connection to the intimacy definitions and sexual contracts. A person can very much love another, but not enter a relationship because they know their definitions and contracts are different. Outside of dogmatic moralities and hygienic common-sense, there is no right and wrong to where people draw their own lines of intimacy. The right and wrong enters when we relate to others intimately. The moralities, emotional needs, and hygienic manners define the expectations of the relationship, and from that, the behavior of the two people involved.

The two separate people become one, even as they are still striving to honor themselves. This can be done harmoniously or disharmoniously. Harmonious is good. Disharmonious can be destructive to all involved. There is a place to walk away from a relationship, or never enter it at all, if the incompatibles between the two people do not promote mutual growth. It can be from a place of Love that a person walks away from another. The honoring of oneself, and the relationship as a whole, can dissolve the same relationship. This does not happen in an environment of comfort or satisfaction. It instead occurs in that space of hard change and observation of the paradoxes of the Divine.
Tags: contract, intimacy monogamy, sex
Subscribe

  • Poem -Set a Sentence

    The poem “Set a Sentence” was inspired by a Facebook posting that stated, “when people my age are all afraid of the world that…

  • Poem - Beyond the Dance

    The poem “Beyond the Dance” is about striving to live beyond the normative. Beyond the Dance Seek a life beyond the dance that span of…

  • Poem - Tradition Tossed

    The poem “Tradition Tossed” is about the suffocation of traditions. Tradition Tossed Where chains of rules are applied to the limbs of…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments